0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

1 out of 18 API elements (5.6 %) have documentation comments.

Providing good documentation for libraries, classes, functions, and other API elements improves code readability and helps developers find and use your API. Document at least 20% of the public API elements.

To highlight public API members missing documentation consider enabling the public_member_api_docs lint.

Some symbols that are missing documentation: flutter_link_previewer, flutter_link_previewer.LinkPreview, flutter_link_previewer.LinkPreview.LinkPreview.new, flutter_link_previewer.LinkPreview.linkStyle, flutter_link_previewer.LinkPreview.metadataTextStyle.

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

• ✓ Web

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 3 issues. Showing the first 2:

   ╷
38 │     if (await canLaunch(link.url)) {
   │               ^^^^^^^^^
   ╵

   ╷
39 │       await launch(link.url);
   │             ^^^^^^
   ╵

0/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

Found 4 issues. Showing the first 2:

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.