queen_validators 0.2.3
queen_validators: ^0.2.3 copied to clipboard
validate variables with extensions and pure flutter TextFormFelid with qValidator function
We analyzed this package 5 days ago, and awarded it 120 pub points (of a possible 160):
0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml
Failed to verify repository URL.
Please provide a valid repository
URL in pubspec.yaml
, such that:
repository
can be cloned,- a clone of the repository contains a
pubspec.yaml
, which:,- contains
name: queen_validators
, - contains a
version
property, and, - does not contain a
publish_to
property.
- contains
pubspec.yaml
from the repository URL mismatch: expected https://github.com/maxzod/queen_validators
but got https://github.com/FlutterQueen/validators
.
Issue tracker URL doesn't exist.
At the time of the analysis https://github.com/maxzod/queen_validators/issues
was unreachable. Make sure that the website is reachable via HEAD
requests.
5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md
5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md
10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license
Detected license: MIT
.
10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments
22 out of 95 API elements (23.2 %) have documentation comments.
Some symbols that are missing documentation: queen_validators
, queen_validators.Contains.Contains.new
, queen_validators.Contains.defaultError
, queen_validators.Contains.isValid
, queen_validators.Contains.value
.
10/10 points: Package has an example
20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)
-
✓ Android
-
✓ iOS
-
✓ Windows
-
✓ Linux
-
✓ macOS
-
✓ Web
0/0 points: WASM compatibility
This package is compatible with runtime wasm
, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.
See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.
30/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues
Found 5 issues. Showing the first 2:
WARNING: The annotation 'mustCallSuper' can only be used on overridable members.
lib/src/imp/validation.dart:11:4
╷
11 │ @mustCallSuper
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
╵
To reproduce make sure you are using the lints_core and run dart analyze lib/src/imp/validation.dart
INFO: The import of 'package:queen_validators/src/functions/is_email.dart' is unnecessary because all of the used elements are also provided by the import of 'package:queen_validators/queen_validators.dart'.
lib/src/rules/is_email.dart:1:8
╷
1 │ import 'package:queen_validators/src/functions/is_email.dart';
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
╵
To reproduce make sure you are using the lints_core and run dart analyze lib/src/rules/is_email.dart
0/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version
Package | Constraint | Compatible | Latest | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
email_validator |
^2.0.1 |
2.1.17 | 3.0.0 | |
meta |
^1.3.0 |
1.16.0 | 1.16.0 |
To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides
.
The constraint `^2.0.1` on email_validator does not support the stable version `3.0.0`.
Try running dart pub upgrade --major-versions email_validator
to update the constraint.
10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs
20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds
pub downgrade
does not expose any static analysis error.
Analyzed with Pana 0.22.20
, Dart 3.7.2
.
Check the analysis log for details.