10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

62 out of 85 API elements (72.9 %) have documentation comments.

Some symbols that are missing documentation: window_toolkit, window_toolkit.Check.Check.new, window_toolkit.Define.Define.new, window_toolkit.Perform.Perform.new, window_toolkit.WindowToolkit.addListener.

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 1 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ macOS

These platforms are not supported:

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

0/0 points: Swift Package Manager support

This package for iOS or macOS does not support the Swift Package Manager. It will not receive full points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://docs.flutter.dev/to/spm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 5 issues. Showing the first 2:

   ╷
59 │       return (widget.backgroundColor ?? CupertinoColors.systemFill).withOpacity(0.7);
   │                                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^
   ╵

    ╷
106 │           border: Border.all(color: Colors.black.withOpacity(0.2), width: 0.5),
    │                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^
    ╵

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.